Thursday 15 October 2009

Why Theories in International Relations

Theories are very important tools for the discipline of international relations, as they enable us to understand past atrocities or events, and are also the only vehicle for states to pursuit and predict their foreign policy in benefit for their nation interest. Although some of the dominant theories have existed since Peloponnesian wars, where Thucydides demonstrates how the pursuit of power and interest shapes the relations between states or reading of Niccolo Machiavelli writings on advice to statesmen on how to maintain power. International Relations as a discipline was established after world war I, in moral grounds, to explain why the war took place and how to prevent one in future; but all these efforts were in vain as they have failed to prevent the WW II.


Nevertheless, studying international relations theories allows to have a better understanding of international politics, make sense of institutions and other events which take place in the world. For example, the atrocities of the two world wars, can be theorised in different ways. Depending on what dimension theorists are looking at:


  1. Realists may argue that the reason for war was the struggle for power; as they believe that, states behave in a self-interest manner because the world is anarchic and states have to position themselves within that system.

  2. Liberals may say that, the lack of local and international institutions or international governing body, was the cause of the conflict; because they argue that states alone can not maintain peace without a international body.

  3. Structuralism would argue that international relations has been shaped by minority capitalists in order to expand their economical ends in exchange of cheap labour from the majority of workers. They believe that capitalism is unjust social and economic order which causes conflict and disharmony between states.

However, both theories seems to present some substance, it is necessary for international relations scholars and students to continue to make analysis and extract a convincing picture of how states behave within the international structure in order to find mechanisms that can prevent future wars.


3 comments:

  1. the problem with IR theories are that they are only of interest to scholars and students but not of world leaders, thus the reason why there have not been a decrease in wars and in the future we may even see more . There are several reasons why we have not seen any major wars such as WW1 and WW2 amongst the major countries , giving two reasons 1. the interconnection of the financial system(the recession that we are now experiencing) 2.the the fact that all of the major countries has nuclear capability that can destroy mankind .

    ReplyDelete
  2. The theory of international relation as i believe has been created in order to analyse pass relationship and establish a guide that will ease the relationship among developed states to the detriment of underdeveloped countries. it is a way of better exploiting these underdeveloped countris by mean of capitalism. The theory is an instruiment used by theorist and capitalist to put barriers on those countries and their commodities so their can not enter the global market.
    If the international theory could be jugde in the realistic way, the world today will not be as it is. Poverty and underdeveolpment will could be a muth rather than a fact.
    thank you.
    lamine

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Lamine,

    Thank you very much for your comment. I agree with you when arguing that theory is an instrument used by capitalists to control international market. However, if you look at Marxixm theory, you may see that is more about equality. It argues against minority liberal capitalism in favour of the majority of labour and peasant. Basically, is in favour of the poor countries! Now the question is, does it work in practice? Why the failure of marxism?
    How about hoping new theories will emerge to close the gap between north and south?

    Manuel

    ReplyDelete